So we should make one with human intelligence, you’re saying?

Okay, but hear me out, what if we make one that isn’t dumb?

Yeah, but what about my hourly latte and avocado toast?

And if you get rid of the board, the shareholders will appointment a new one. If you somehow get rid of all the shareholders, like-minded people will slot themselves into those positions.

The problems are systemic, not individual.

Any poll that asks the general public to pick something is inevitably going to turn into a popularity contest, irrespective of its original intent.

I was looking up bike lanes in a city I was thinking of buying a house in and the map had property lines on it, with the registered owners names plastered in every space.

What if he’s just throwing shade at Apple’s own AI division?

employees calling out

Why would the employee have to look up a publicly listed number to call their employers to call out? That’s something a private line could easily take care of.

Why even have a phone number if it is useless?

Really? Are reservations the only use for a phone?

A publicly shared phone number for the restaurant? Pretty much. It has limited uses for checking hours and holidays and such, but the primary use is going to be checking availability to eat at the restaurant. If that’s not something you can get over the phone, 99% of the reason to have a public facing phone number is negated.

“Raise volume”

At least two.

I imagine the implication is that no cryptocurrency stuff is inserted in the spot that google once occupied.

They’re conflating tech with tech bros.

Tech can and does make lots of things that make our lives longer and better. Just not most of the consumer level shit that is constantly peddled by snake oil sellers. That tech is not meant to make your lives easier, it’s meant to get more money out of you without giving it up to the little people at service level.

The problem isn’t the tech, it’s the people who are controlling the tech.

Yeah, but most cries (including this article) aren’t “We want both” but “We want small instead”. The article goes out of its way to ridicule “huge” phones.

The battle cry seems to be demanding it their way instead of variety.

Their response wasn’t to fix the problem, it was to find a better way to subjugate people. Clearly his methods aren’t the solution. They’re just an easy way to pass the problem off to someone else without you having to put in the effort to help fix it yourself.

Pringles comes with a lot more than a grain of salt…

Outside sarcastic internet forums? Probably, yeah.

You are the exception, not the rule. Just because you have an easy time with something does not mean everyone does. Everyone experiences interaction in a different way.

Just because it brings no value to your life does not mean that opinion is universal.

So… they didn’t remove it, they moved it.

But that’s really neither here nor there, as it’s just words. I’ve never known a company to care much about words over profit.

Are there brake problems again?