Cell != Battery

Battery = MANY Cells

I am not correcting you just hate the headline.

If you made a battery with 666(667 if we round up) of these you could supply 2ma of power at 3v for 50 years!

I don’t have sizes available so assuming 2032 sized batteries… If you stacked them that would be over 2meters tall.

With further advancement these could be viable

A lot more than that. 2ma

Analog circuits are weird though

https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ne555.pdf

Yeah, last I checked nothing in the US comes from Iran due to sanctions.

Elizabeth Holmes only got in trouble for lying to people who should’ve done their “due diligence”

The patients / families of the patients that Theranos lied to and mislead never got justice.

Yeah it is awful for intermittent printing; you will not get as many prints as you expect but it WILL still print (after you run a couple of maintenance cycles to flush out the dry ink)

it was Louis Rossman and recently was within the past month; That said its currently being discussed

I don’t really like Louis Rossman much but most of his critiques of companies not treating consumers correctly are typically correct

Personally speaking though removing old firmware from site and adding a genuine cartridge check are the first steps you would take to begin limiting users.

EcoTank I like because Epson can literally NOT confirm if the ink is genuine or not (if you REALLY were determined you could even get Magenta into the Cyan tank and it would still squirt ink out… although incorrectly of course)

The printer I am liking right now isn’t laser but comes out to be about the same cost to print as laser.

It’s the Epson EcoTank. The print quality is pretty good for things where a laser printer is the wrong tool and the refills are relatively reasonable… and Shaq promotes it!

Brother has pulled some shit recently…

16.66 for min wage but all the jobs are part-time with no scheduling sanity so holding two jobs is difficult to impossible. Anyone realizing this isn’t an accident?

Government in this case is forcing sites to collect PII to verify age not blocking content not blocking content themselves.

I am working under the knowledge that these age verifications are not theoretical (Its the end game of all the KYC startups from last decade)

If you are in the south in much of the US these ID checks are already forced and will only expand

A browser header gives the result without building a Database of people who like porn

Browser headers also put the responsibility on sites that promote dangerous things to kids (its in your best interest as a site that can deliver porn, things not suitable for kids to check and respect the header from a liability perspective)

Sites and services today that we are considering forcing to collect PII (driver’s license) for age verification would be compelled to check the header as it would provide what these laws are chasing in a way more respectful towards privacy

As far as exploiting children online. My point has been clear that is already happening, TikTok, Youtube, Instagram ALL exploit children online today. They do not face consequences because they can hide behind their TOS this would put responsibility with regards to not breaking our already existing laws back into their hands

I trust parets. I have kids myself the plethora of tools and systems available to invade you kids’ privacy is great… and those are also even way worse than a header (especially when you consider what they do to work)

I am actually in full agreement.

A header would put the setting on the device and only indicate “Minor” or “Not Minor” which would allow to restrict or allow porn without having to collect everyone’s PII just so they can crank their hog.

If you read previous things though such an indicator would put a lot more responsibility onto Social Media platforms to not show harmful content to minors. Today they get away with it because “TOS says only 18 year olds are allowed to us this service”

South Park kind of nailed the attitude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_(Not_Suitable_for_Children)

The laws around advertising are fucked to begin with but the headers SHOULD be used in advertising 100%

The minor flag would actually remove the LARGE gray area that platforms take advantage of to push harmful ADs and content to kids (Today they just get to play dumb)

This would actually create a framework to enforce existing advertising laws as well as data collection laws with regards to minors.

Examples: Minors should not see ads for holsters, knives, ammo, ED medications, Diet drugs, muscle building drugs, Alcohol, Tobacco products, Online Gambling

These are all things I have seen advertised on YouTube to me; Granted I am not a minor but I am also just using Youtube by going to the site with no account.

I have to agree with PornHub’s idea.

A device should be able it indicate in its browser headers whether its primary user is an adult or a minor and the service can react accordingly.

It won’t protect all the children but children of parents who can’t be assed to setup a device properly will have problems no matter how much we increase the surveillance state.

LLNL has achieved positive power output with their experiments. https://www.llnl.gov/article/49301/shot-ages-fusion-ignition-breakthrough-hailed-one-most-impressive-scientific-feats-21st

No fusion reactor today is actually going to generate power in the useful sense.

These are more about understanding how Fusion works so that a reactor that is purpose built to generate power can be developed in the future.

Unlike the movies real development is the culmination of MANY small steps.

Today we are holding reactions for 20 minutes. 20 years ago getting a reaction to self sustain in the first place seemed impossible.