don’t be evil

haven’t seen it so far, but technology connections will always get an upvote.

also consider subscribing to his channel, his videos are amazing.

is this some freeze peach bullshit i’m to european to understand?

hate speech, difamation, etc should be prosecuted. period.

or just use syncthing, nextcloud, ect and stop supporting tech oligarchs.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Verify2024/comments/1ij7136/how_ethan_shaotran_may_have_interfered_in_the/

discord is a plague

to me it was clear that the us is heading into authoriatism, that’s why i thought his statement was interessting.
“so, we can’t trust you either?” kinda way.

but yeah, we better pull very hard on those bootstraps.

things like that make me think that llms still have a long way to go.

it basicly means, that things that i do, i assume a lot of people do.

for example:
people cheating, have a higher tendency to suspect their partner of cheating.

or in this case:
vance knows what they are going to do with the data.

danke merkel

He also warned European states not to partner with authoritarian states on AI development.

“Partnering with them means chaining your nation to an authoritarian master that seeks to infiltrate, dig in and seize your information infrastructure,” he said.

in german we say: was ich denk und tu, trau ich andern zu.

which translats to something like: what I think and do, I trust others to do

“So I say bring him back,” Vance continued. “If he’s a bad dude or a terrible member of the team, fire him for that.”

guy maried to indian woman, having half indian kid wants anti-indian nazi to come back.

can’t make this shit up…

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jd-vance/bring-back-vance-says-supports-rehiring-doge-staffer-resigned-racist-s-rcna191224

Meta’s Llama models also impose licensing restrictions on its users. For example, if you have an extremely successful AI program that uses Llama code, you’ll have to pay Meta to use it. That’s not open source. Period.

open source != no license restrictions

According to Meta, “Existing open source definitions for software do not encompass the complexities of today’s rapidly advancing AI models. We are committed to keep working with the industry on new definitions to serve everyone safely and responsibly within the AI community.”

i think, he’s got a point, tho

is ai open source, when the trainig data isn’t?
as i understand, right now: yes, it’s enough, that the code is open source. and i think that’s a big problem

i’m not deep into ai, so correct me if i’m wrong.

nah, clearly denmark

please let the username not check out…

let the hunger games begin…

ahahahaha…

depends on your distro.
an internet search like “debian jellyfin install” should point you into the right direction.

if in doubt or having trouble: there’s a friendly linux community around the corner.

all my homies use jellyfin…

the enshittification begins…

if you read the whole sentence it might make more sense…

i used […] in their time.