walden

Chinstrap Linux haha. It’s like Fedora, but for a totally different demographic.

I didn’t know Gentoo was named after a penguin.

They can be charged below 0*C, too. No need to redirect lots of current to heating the batteries during charging like with Lithium.

Unbelievable levels of ingenuity.

Here’s a link to buy it https://bookshop.org/p/books/careless-people-a-cautionary-tale-of-power-greed-and-lost-idealism/22213433

The homepage just has recently added devices. Use the menu to browse by device type.

The Tasmota firmware documentation has a decent list, but it’s limited to devices that are known to be flash-able so you can install custom firmware on them. https://templates.blakadder.com/

Have you ever heard the phrase “don’t dip the pen in company ink”?

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.html

I tried finding API pricing for Google but it’s probably buried somewhere. They make it sound “free” but with usage limits, which surely Kagi exceeds? Either way, it’s probably on a “per-call” basis, and Google gets a lot less money that way compared to crapping out money driven search results.

“Our unique algorithms down-rank pages with a lot of ads and trackers (which we have found correlate with a decrease in content quality) and promote content from independent, ad-free sources and personal websites.”

I’m sure it’s not perfect, but my experience with Kagi has been very very good. With DuckDuckGo I’d often have to revert to Google to find what I was looking for, but not with Kagi.

I pay for Kagi, so my opinion might be clouded by confirmation bias.

My true fans will hang around for my year understanding.

Not YouTube because the ads come from the same “source”, so blocking that DNS would mean blocking the actual video, too. That’s my week understanding of it, at least.

There’s no timestamp for when things go missing, though.

Is there a mail option?

It sounds like we agree, but I’m much less lawerly due to my lack of experience in that field.

The creator of Lemmy is just one example. They remove a lot of content that isn’t hateful, just against their political ideology. I used that as an example of a private social media website which does a lot of censoring, even though the creators are sort of, somehow, outwardly against censoring? So everyone is human is my point.

The article in question is about hate speech, not political dissent. Hate speech is pretty widely moderated away on Lemmy, and I think a majority of people here are cool with that. Some here are arguing semantics which is fair. Censoring is censoring which is the definition of censoring. I’m in the camp that if someone online is threatening another person or group of people, that should be hidden/removed.

There’s a big difference between utterly insane tankie takes and hateful content.

Are you saying it should be required by law to have a comment regarding removal of content?

That’s the problem with the internet, really. You can’t punch these a-holes through your monitor or keyboard. The consequence here is moderation instead of physical violence. Removing these people from their platform is the punch in the nuts that they deserve. It’s still free speech because these are non-government websites.

Edit to make it less mean sounding.

Lemmy was created because Desaulines(sp?) got “censored” on reddit. Now he famously over-censors his darling instance lemmy.ml.

My point is just that nobody really thinks it should be a free for all. Everyone is human and doesn’t want to hear anything that they consider egregious, or in the case of lemmy.ml “against rule 2”.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect it to act the same even when turned off. I have something similar set up on my linux laptop, and the charging is limited even when the computer is turned off.