

Analogy. I’m simply applying your reasoning to designate random murders as terrorism.
Analogy. I’m simply applying your reasoning to designate random murders as terrorism.
“It’s clear that the mass murderer didn’t have personal beef with the women he killed. It’s ideological because he hates society.”
So I guess everything is terrorism.
If every ideological thought is also political, then so are most murders.
If everything is political, then nothing is political.
These are billionaire CEOs, not artists. There’s nothing particularly mysterious about their work, which you can learn all about from the many, many self-fellating autobiographies their ghost writers churn out every year.
I can’t imagine how hard it must be to manage a company as big and complex as YouTube.
To be fair, not at all. Someone in her position would be making broad decisions, such as “should we have a downvote button,” and spending her time courting advertisers and handling the whiny board of directors, who are mostly geriatric babies.
The claim was that by your reasoning, situations that are not terrorism would be classified as terrorism.